
For years it has been widely believed that teaching foreign languages to children at early age is advantageous (Zein & Garton, 2019; Pinter, 2017; Griva & Semoglou, 2015; Enever, 2011). However, the most common concern was the stereotypical view that learning a foreign language will lead to language confusion, language development delay or cognitive deficit, as children who start to learn their mother tongue within the school context, would get confused, if they were simultaneously introduced to a foreign language (Lang, 2009).
Nevertheless, the initial worries were progressively eradicated, as research results indicated quite the opposite (Ghasemi & Hashemi, 2011). In particular, it has been recorded that exposing a young child to a foreign language, allows a learner to develop a great number of cognitive, social-emotional and academic-career benefits, which are of utmost importance for the entire life (Papadopoulos, 2020; Papadopoulos & Savic, 2020).
There are growing appeals for investigating childhood as the golden age for foreign language learning. Most recent evidence proposes that the older is faster, but the young is better (Hu, 2016). Based on the Critical Period Hypothesis, proposed by Lenneberg (1967), language acquisition needs to take place between the age of two and puberty with the establishment of cerebral lateralization of function (Snow & Hoefnagel-Höhle, 1978). Using the term “lateralization”, it is implied that the human’s left hemisphere, which is responsible for the language process, is connected with human’s biological change/development. In other words, there is a critical period by which children can acquire a foreign language naturally and efficiently, but after the age of puberty, learners are less susceptible to input as the brain cannot longer function in the same way (Lenneberg, 1967).
Although older learners appear to progress faster, young learners surpass the previous ones in the ultimate attainment as they achieve better phonetic/phonological performance and later proficiency in foreign language learning (Singleton, 2003).
Cognitive skills development has been connected to learning a foreign language at a young age (Alexiou, 2009). As a matter of fact, children who study foreign languages, exhibit greater performances in basic skills at school, that is to say, higher academic performance. For instance, they outscore their non-foreign language learning peers when complex problems are undergone, indicating that learning additional language is a cognitive activity not just a linguistic one (Focus, 2017). Children are depicted as sponges that can mimic new sounds and patterns, and they can absorb new information unconsciously. Some studies have found that children have an innate ability to acquire the rules of any language thanks to the plasticity of the brain and ear (AdminOxford, 2018). The brain is open to new sounds and therefore, the pronunciation of a foreign language can be adopted easily.
Systematic studies highlight also many psychological and cognitive benefits derived from learning a foreign language, which are the development of critical thinking, flexible thinking and the flowering of a creative mind to young children (Barac & Bialystok, 2011). Needless to mention that they receive second language instruction, which makes them more creative and better at solving difficult tasks than those who do not (Bamford & Mizokawa qtd in Rizki, 2016). Consequently, higher intellectual flexibility can be achieved by early language learners and critical thinking skills can be raised rapidly.
The position of English Learning in Greece
In the last half-century the status of English in the world has changed rapidly as English has been labeled as a global language used in more contexts such as science, trade, education and sports. It acts as a lingua franca, that is, a common language which connects people from different backgrounds and ethnicities. Over the years, there is a massive increase in English speakers around the globe, who use it at different levels of proficiency for various reasons and there are a number of countries, which adopt it as a first language or else mother-tongue, as an official language and as a foreign language. Since English is highly promoted in everyday life, it has been chosen as a first foreign language in Greek education.
According research conducted by Sougari & Hovhannisyan (2013), it was shown that Greek students have a great desire to learn English for pragmatic reasons and they want to achieve this goal by all means. Their motivation is related to their future career success and getting a proficiency certificate in English. Moreover, key role plays the pressure of society, the influence of parents (Griva & Semoglou, 2015) and the expectations and pressure of the peers. These views are in line with Gardner and Lambert’s (1972) research who claimed that there are integrative and instrumental reasons to learn a second language, referring to the social interaction and communication with members of the target language community and as for instrumental reasons; they refer to professional, social and academic reasons.
In accordance with the European Language Policy, which aims at creating multilingual and plurilingual citizens and the European developments in ELL (early language learning), English should be introduced in Greek schools at early age. The programme which has come to be known through its Greek acronym “PEAP” and it had been developed as part of the funded project entitled “New Foreign Language Education Policy in Schools: English for young learners” suggests that students should be introduced to English at the age of 6-7 (Dendrinos, Zouganeli & Karavas, 2013).
The main purpose is to develop young learners’ social literacies through English in combination with special syllabi and instructional materials based on this holistic approach (Dendrinos, Zouganeli & Karavas, 2013). To be more specific, the curriculum suggests three essential principles:
- it aims at increasing students’ social skills which have been acquired in their mother tongue through English .
- it treats every child as an individual with different interests, as it takes into consideration the various interests, preferences and learning styles of students.
- it intends to develop a pre-A1 level ability to understand and use English in everyday life.
And that’s it: an effective school environment with the appropriate learning materials in which the sooner you start learning English, the better!
References
AdminOxford (2018). The Benefits of Learning a Second Language Early. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordclil.es/the-benefits-of-learning-a-second-language-early/
Alexiou, T. (2009). Young Learners’ Cognitive Skills and Their Role in Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning. In M. Nikolov, Early Learning of Modern Foreign Languages/ Processes and Outcomes (pp. 46-61). Great Britain: Short Run Press Ltd.
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching, 44(1), 36-54. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000339.
Dendrinos, B., Zouganeli, K. & Kossovitsa, C. (2013). The English for Young Learners Programme in Greek Primary School. PEAP. Retrieved from http://rcel.enl.uoa.gr/peap/en/articles/programme.
Enever, J. (2011). ELLiE: Early language learning in Europe. London: British Council.
Focus (2017). The importance of children learning a foreign language. Retrieved from https://www.focus-info.org/includes/documents/2017/f/foc58_education.pdf.
Gardner R.C. (2006).Motivation and Attitudes in Second Language learning. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp.348-355). London: Elsevier.
Papadopoulos, I. (2020) From the pedagogy of translanguaging to the classroom pedagogy. Disigma Publications.
Papadopoulos, I., & Savic, V. (2020). Teaching Young Foreign Language Learners in SE Europe. Thessaloniki: Disigma Publications.





























